1. やまラボ Podcast
  2. Simulating the Ancient Glow ..
2025-05-03 18:36

Simulating the Ancient Glow of Fireflies

In this episode, we talk about our research to figure out what color fireflies glowed during the age of dinosaurs using quantum chemical calculations.

Summary

ホタルの古代の光を模倣する方法について、新たな科学の進歩やその実用的な利用法を探求しています。大場教授の研究チームは、ウミゼミの古代の光の色を再構築するための進化的手法に取り組んでいます。また、古代のホタルと現代のルシフェラーゼの比較を通じて、光の色の変化がアミノ酸の違いに起因することを示した研究を探っています。このエピソードでは、古代のホタルと現代のホタルの色の違いがアミノ酸と水分子の相互作用に基づいていることが示されています。さらに、ホタルの光のメカニズムやその進化の物語を探求し、自然界に隠された複雑な科学的事実について考察しています。

ホタルの生物発光の魅力
Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today, we're diving head first into the dazzling world of bioluminescence.
That amazing ability of living things to make their own light.
Exactly. You know, think fireflies blinking on a summer night, or maybe those eerie glowing jellyfish way down in the ocean.
It's really something, isn't it? Nature's creativity. And I know you, our listener, you probably share that wonder.
Yeah, and appreciate getting a good handle on complex stuff without needing like a PhD.
That's the goal.
Absolutely. And that's what we're aiming for today. We've got some great material here, lecture notes, really getting into the nuts and bolts.
And a presentation focusing on ancient fireflies, which sounds fascinating.
It really does. So, our mission is understand how and why they light up, look at the, well, surprisingly practical uses for this natural light.
And even go back in time a bit to see what color ancient fireflies glowed.
You got it. Millions of years ago.
OK, so prepare for things to get illuminating. Unintended, maybe.
Definitely. We'll cover the basic chemistry, the cutting edge science using it, and yeah, that evolutionary story of the fireflies glow.
Sounds great. Let's get started.
生物発光の化学反応
OK, let's unpack this. Bioluminescence. At its most basic level, what is it? How does this biological light actually happen?
Well, in essence, it's chemistry, a chemical reaction that produces light.
OK.
So imagine you've got a specific substance inside the organism, right? The light emitter. An enzyme gives it a boost of energy, kind of like winding up a spring.
Right, energizing it.
Exactly. It goes into what scientists call an excited state, high energy.
Got it.
But it doesn't want to stay there. It wants to get back to its stable ground state.
Like everything seeks stability.
Precisely. And when it drops back down, it releases that extra energy.
Yeah.
Boom light.
Like a tiny biological light switch flicking on. And we're talking fireflies, jellyfish. Those are the classic examples.
Yeah, they're perfect examples. Everyone knows them. In fireflies, the main players are a molecule called luciferin.
Luciferin. OK.
And an enzyme, luciferase.
Luciferase. Sounds almost magical.
It kind of is. Think of luciferin as the fuel, maybe, and luciferase as the, I don't know, the spark plug or the engine that makes it work.
Fuel and engine. I like that.
So how do those two play? You mentioned other ingredients. How do they make the blink?
OK. Yeah, this is where the chemistry gets really neat. And there's a few things.
First, luciferin and luciferase have to get together.
Right.
But they also need energy that comes from ATP, the soul's energy currency, basically.
ATP, yeah. Learned about that in biology.
And oxygen. You need oxygen, too. When all those meet, you get this activated luciferin. It's ready to go.
Activated. Primed to glow.
Exactly.
Then this activated molecule changes shape, forming this tiny, really unstable ring structure, a dioxetane ring.
Dioxetane. OK. Unstable. So it breaks.
It doesn't last long. It breaks down. And when it does, it kicks out carbon dioxide, CO2.
Ah, OK.
And that release of CO2 is sort of the key step.
It pushes the leftover molecule, now called oxylucerin, into that high energy excited state.
So kicking out the CO2 is like flipping the light switch on.
In a way, yeah.
That's the moment of excitation.
Yeah.
Then, as that excited oxylucerin relaxes back down to its stable ground state...
It has to shed that extra energy.
And it does that by emitting it as light, fluorescence. That's the glow we see.
Wow.
And what's really cool is that tiny differences in the luciferase enzyme in different species create slightly different pockets for this reaction.
Which changes the light.
Exactly. It tweaks the energy levels just enough to produce different colors. Green, yellow, blue.
It's amazing diversity from a similar core reaction.
It's like this tiny, perfectly timed chemical dance ending in light. Incredible.
生物発光の科学的応用
Now, you mentioned this isn't just, you know, pretty lights. It has serious scientific uses.
Oh, absolutely. It's been revolutionary for biology.
Yeah.
A huge moment was the 2008 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Right, for jellyfish research.
Yes, awarded to Dr. Osamu Shimomura for his work on jellyfish bioluminescence.
And it wasn't just, oh, need jellyfish glow. It gave us incredible tools.
The Nobel Prize, wow. That signals it was a game changer. How did jellyfish light change things?
Well, Dr. Shimomura discovered and figured out green fluorescent protein, GFP, from a jellyfish called Echorea victoria.
GFP, heard of that one?
Yeah. What makes GFP and also the firefly system so incredibly useful is, well, imaging technology.
Imaging, seeing things.
Seeing things inside living cells.
Yeah.
In real time.
Without stopping the processes.
細胞の可視化
It's like installing tiny little lamps on the molecules you want to watch.
Wow, like a microscopic spy camera inside a cell.
What kind of things can scientists see now?
Think about tracking a specific protein.
You could attach GFP to it.
Then you can watch where it goes when a gene is being read.
That's transcription.
OK.
Or when proteins are being built.
Translation.
You can see how proteins move around, how they're used, even how they get broken down later.
It's all visible under the microscope because the tag protein glows green.
That's amazing.
Actually visualizing the cell's machinery at work.
What are some of the big insights from this?
Well, we can get these stunning visuals of cells dividing, for example.
Or watch molecules being shuttled along tiny tracks inside the cell microtubules.
It's just given us this unprecedented view of how cells are organized and how they function dynamically.
Really transforms cell biology.
And firefly light is used too, you said.
Not just jellyfish GFP.
Yes.
Firefly bioluminescence has its own applications, especially in cancer research.
For imaging cancer cells.
How does that work?
Scientists can get the firefly's luciferin, the fuel to concentrate inside cancer cells, more than healthy cells.
Why?
Are cancer cells different?
They often have different metabolisms, yeah.
So they might take up or process the luciferin differently.
When the luciferin is there and if the luciferase enzyme is also present or introduced.
They light up.
They light up.
It makes the cancer cells glow.
So researchers can detect them, track them, see if treatments are working.
Like the cancer cells are flagging themselves.
A tiny beacon saying, here I am.
What's the sort of future direction for that?
Well, they're always trying to improve it.
One big area is engineering modified luciferins that emit red light.
Why red?
Red light travels better through biological tissues than green or yellow light does.
Ah, penetrates deeper.
Exactly.
Yeah.
So red emitting luciferins could let scientists see cancer cells located deeper inside the body.
Like in experiments with mice.
You might see images of glowing tumors inside a living mouse.
The goal is clearer signals from deeper locations.
Mind-blowing stuff.
From firefly blinks to potential cancer tools.
That's quite a leap.
It really is.
OK.
古代ホタルの復元
Let's totally switch gears now.
This part of the source material really caught my eye.
Figuring out what color ancient fireflies glowed.
Sounds like biological detective work.
It absolutely is.
To tackle that question, we look at the work of Professor Oba and his team.
They use this really clever technique, ancestral sequence reconstruction, ASR.
Ancestral sequence reconstruction, OK.
They use it to predict the genes, specifically the luciferase gene, of fireflies that lived, get this, around 90 million years ago.
90 million, wow, Cretaceous period, dinosaurs roaming around.
Pretty much.
So how on earth do you reconstruct a gene from that long ago?
There's no DNA left, surely.
No, no fossil DNA.
It's based on evolution.
Think of it like building a family tree, but for genes.
OK.
You compare the luciferase genes from lots of different living firefly species.
You see how they're related, how they've changed over time.
Right, map out the relationships.
Then you use computational methods, statistics, to work backward up the tree, to infer the most likely sequence of the gene in their common ancestor, way back when.
Sort of like reverse engineering the evolutionary changes.
That's a good way to put it.
And Professor Oba's team did this to reconstruct an ancestral luciferase enzyme.
They named it NCLAMP.
NCLAMP, cool name, like ancient lamp.
Exactly.
They think it's a precursor to the luciferase in modern Gen G fireflies, which are common today.
So did they, like, make this NCLAMP protein in the lab?
Did it glow?
They did.
They synthesized the gene based on their prediction, put it into cells, and got it to produce the enzyme.
And yes, it glowed.
What color was it?
That's the kicker.
It glowed green.
Green.
But modern ones are.
Modern Gen G fireflies glow yellow green.
Whoa.
So the color actually shifted over evolutionary time, from green to yellow green?
Seems like it.
Imagine T-Rex looking up at green twinkling lights in the forest.
That is a wild image.
So green back then, yellow green now.
Did they stop there or try to figure out why?
Well, they definitely wanted to know why.
Observation is one thing, understanding the mechanism is another.
Right.
So they also used some heavy-duty computer modeling, something called QMMM TDDFT simulations.
QMMM.
OK, that sounds complicated.
シミュレーションの結果
Quantum mechanics involved?
Yep.
Quantum mechanics, molecular mechanics, time-dependent density functional theory.
It lets researchers like Mr. Obote, who led this part, build really detailed computer models of the enzyme and predict its properties.
Like predicting the color of light it should emit.
Exactly.
They simulated both the ancient NCLAMP and the modern luciferase.
And what did the simulations show?
Did they match the lab results?
They predicted that NCLAMP, the ancient one, would emit light at a shorter wavelength, around 462 nanometers.
Shorter wavelength.
That's towards the blue-green end of the spectrum, right?
Correct.
And the modern one was predicted around 500 nanometers, longer wavelength, more towards yellow-green.
OK, so the simulation predicted the same trend as the experiment, ancient, shorter, modern, longer.
Precisely.
Now, the exact numbers weren't identical to the lab measurements.
Simulations are models, after all.
The lab measured about 548 millimeters for ancient and 562 millimeters for modern.
Right, there's a gap.
But the shift.
But the shift was consistent.
Both experiment and simulation showed the ancient light was bluer or greener, shorter wavelength than the modern one.
That consistency is really important.
It gives confidence they're onto something real.
OK, so the evidence points to ancient green, modern yellow-green.
That's fascinating.
アミノ酸の役割
But the big question remains.
Why did it change?
What happened at the molecular level?
That's the multi-million year, multi-million dollar question, isn't it?
What caused the color tuning?
Yeah.
Professor Oba's earlier research had already compared the sequences, the amino acid building blocks of these proteins.
Right, the sequence differences.
And they'd spotted differences in the area where the luciferin molecule binds the active site or ligand binding site.
The lock for the luciferin key.
Good analogy.
They noticed specific amino acid swaps between the ancient and modern versions.
One key one was an isoleucine, ILE, in the ancient N-clamp, being replaced by a valine, VAL, in the modern one, L-Gluc1.
Just swapping one amino acid building block, can that really change the color?
It absolutely can.
Proteins are incredibly sensitive.
Change one piece, especially in a critical spot like the active site, and you can alter its shape, its flexibility, its electronic environment.
Which could affect the light emission.
Okay.
And they looked deeper at the 3D structures.
They found that the distance between the light-emitting part of the molecule, the oxylucerin, after the reaction, and another nearby amino acid, phenylamine, or Phe, that distance was shorter in the ancient enzyme.
Closer together in the ancient one.
Yes, closer in N-clamp than in the modern L-Gluc1.
That suggested maybe an interaction between that Phe and the light emitter was involved in tuning the color.
Makes sense.
The immediate neighborhood around the glowing molecule must affect its glow.
Did they use computers again to check this distance thing?
They did.
Mr. Abbott ran molecular dynamics, or MD, simulations.
These basically simulate the protein wiggling and jiggling over time.
Like a molecular movie.
Kind of, yeah.
And those simulations confirmed the distance difference.
The average distance between that phenylamine and the oxylucerin was shorter in the ancient enzyme model.
So computation backed up the structural observation.
Okay.
So structure changed, distance changed.
But how do you prove which amino acid is really responsible for the color shift?
Not just the Phe's, maybe others too.
Great question.
They needed a way to pinpoint the crucial players.
So they used another clever computational trick inspired by a lab technique called alanine scanning.
Alanine scanning?
What's that?
In the lab, you'd systematically replace each amino acid in a region of interest with alanine, which is kind of small and neutral, chemically speaking.
Then you see how that change affects the protein's function like its light color.
Ah, so you swap out parts one by one to see which one breaks it or changes it.
Exactly.
If changing amino acid X to alanine causes a big color shift, then amino acid X was probably important for the original color.
Okay, but they did this computationally.
Yes, using a method they called charge scanning.
Instead of changing the amino acid, they used the computer model to just set the electrical charge of specific amino acid residues to zero, temporarily, in the simulation.
Turn off its electrical influence while keeping the structure.
Precisely.
This isolates the effect of electrostatic interactions, the push and pull of positive and negative charges on the light emission color.
古代と現代の色の違い
If turning off the charge of residue Y causes a big wavelength shift,
Then residue Y's charge was critical for the color tuning.
Clever.
Very clever.
So what did the charge scanning show?
Who were the culprits?
Okay, in the ancient anclamp, the green one turning off the charge of one specific arginine residue, ARG336, caused a massive redshift.
The predicted wavelength jumped by plus 29 nanometers.
29 nanometers, that's huge.
So ARG336 was definitely pulling the color towards green.
Its charge was essential for green.
That's what it strongly indicated.
Its electrostatic interaction with the luciferin was critical for that specific green emission.
What about the modern yellow-green one?
L-GLUP-1.
Different story there.
The most impactful residue identified by charge scanning was a lysine, Lys-531.
Turning off its charge caused a big blue shift, negative 27 nanometers.
Opposite effect.
So a different charged amino acid is key in the modern enzyme.
Seems so.
Suggesting a different electrostatic mechanism is responsible for the shift to yellow-green.
They also noted ATP, the energy molecule.
Right, that showed shifts too.
Yeah, big shifts in both.
But since ATP is needed in both ancient and modern, they figured it wasn't the reason for the difference in color between them.
OK, so ARG336 in the ancient, Lys-531 in the modern seem to be key electrostatic tuners.
And stronger interactions mean bigger effect on color?
Exactly.
The strength of that electrical push-pull between the charged amino acid and the light-emitting molecule really matters.
So did they visualize these interactions?
See why ARG336 was so important anciently?
They did.
They looked at their models, mapping out the electrostatic fields, and they saw that in ANCLAMP, that ancient ARG336 formed strong interactions with the luciferin.
It was close, and the geometry was right for a strong electrical connection.
But in the modern one, the corresponding residue.
In the modern ALKALOOSE-1, the arginine in the equivalent position, ARG339, showed much weaker interactions with luciferin.
Weaker, even though it's the same type of amino acid, an arginine.
Why would it be weaker?
Uh-huh.
This is the most elegant part of the discovery, I think.
Okay.
They found that in the modern enzyme structure, there are usually three water molecules sitting right in the gap between the luciferin and that ARG339.
Water molecules, just H2O.
Three tiny water molecules acting like spacers, or maybe like insulation.
Insulating the electrical interaction.
Exactly.
They get in the way, they buffer the electrostatic force between the charged arginine and the light emitter, beaconing it.
And in the ancient one, ANCLAMP?
In the ANCLAMP models, that space was empty.
No water molecules got in there.
So the ARG336 could get closer and interact much more strongly with the luciferin.
Wow.
So the presence or absence of a few water molecules is the key difference that explains the color shift over 90 million years.
That's the proposed mechanism.
And it's incredibly compelling.
That is surprisingly simple in concept, but profound.
It really is.
So the picture is, ancient fireflies.
ARG336 interacts strongly with luciferin.
No water in the way, green light.
Right.
Modern fireflies.
Evolution changed the pocket shape slightly, allowing water molecules to sneak in between luciferin and the equivalent arginine, ARG339.
Water weakens the interaction, like yellow-green light.
Few molecules of water changing the color of evolution's light show.
That's incredible.
It's a beautiful piece of molecular detective work.
And the sources rightly credit Professor Yuichi Oba, Professor Toru Nakatsu, and Mr. Sudo Obote for pulling this story together.
Absolutely.
Real collaborative science.
Is that the end of the story, or are they looking even further back?
Oh, the quest continues.
Professor Oba's group is now looking even earlier in evolution, trying to understand where luciferase came from in the first place.
Before it made light.
Possibly.
There's evidence suggesting the ancestral enzyme, before it was luciferase, might have done something completely different, maybe related to activating fatty acids.
So it was repurposed by evolution.
From fat metabolism to making light.
That's the hypothesis they're exploring.
The grand evolutionary story of how fireflies even got their lanterns.
Wow.
OK.
From the basic chemistry, the luciferin-luciferase reaction.
To the Nobel-winning GFP applications?
Seeing inside cells?
Imaging cancer?
All the way back 90 million years to green, glowing, ancient fireflies, and figuring out it might all hinge on a few water molecules.
It's really been quite the journey, hasn't it?
ホタルの光のメカニズム
A deep dive, for sure.
Truly illuminating.
We've covered the mechanism, the amazing applications, and this fascinating evolutionary color shift.
We really have.
From basic science to medical tech to evolutionary history.
It just makes you think, doesn't it?
How many other things in nature that seem simple, like a blinking light?
Actually hold these incredibly complex, intricate stories at the molecular level.
Stories shaped over millions of years.
Exactly.
What other evolutionary surprises are hidden in plain sight, just waiting for us to figure out the molecular clues?
It's humbling, really.
The interplay of structure, function, environment, and time.
It's the core of biology.
Well, thanks for exploring that intricate world with me today.
My pleasure.
It was fascinating stuff.
18:36

Comments

Scroll