Hello everyone, SCIEN-SPOT is a podcast that shines a spotlight on the latest scientific
technology from Japan. Your host is REN from SCIEN-TALK. Have you ever used a smartphone app
to take photos of rare creatures you spotted in town and posted them? Well, it turns out that
this simple act of posting could potentially contribute significantly to biodiversity
conservation, a crucial effort for the future of our planet. Today on SCIEN-SPOT, we'll dive into
the cutting edge of citizen science, exploring the surprising impact of incentives on our behavior
based on the latest research from Osaka University. First, biodiversity refers to the rich
individuality of living organisms or earth and the connection between them. It's considered at
three levels, ecosystems, species, and genes, and biodiversity conservation aims to protect
these natural systems and path them on the future generation. Why is it so important?
Because humans are also in part of nature's intricate web and the loss of biodiversity
can destabilize the very foundation of our lives. To protect this biodiversity, accurate information
on where, what kind of species, and how many are living is essential. Traditionally, surveys have
In this experiment, 830 app users who agreed to participate were randomly divided into three
groups. First, the donation-based incentive group. For each post, 10 yen was donated to
environmental organization. Second, the monetary incentive group. For each post, a monetary coupon
worth 10 yen was given. And third, the control group received no incentives at all. The posting
behavior of each group was then compared. The results were incredibly interesting.
First, in the monetary incentive group, the number of posts significantly increased. This might be
easy to imagine. If you make an effort to post, you get a direct benefit. On the other hand,
in the donation-based incentive group, no significant increase in the total number of
posts was observed. However, a crucial discovery was made here. This group showed a tendency to
increase the proportion of rare species posts. What does this mean? It indicates that the type
of incentive has the potential to change not only the quantity of posting behavior,
but also its content. That's the key finding of this research. Let's use an analogy from fishing.
The monetary incentive is like a reward system where you were told,
we'll pay you for every fish you catch, no matter what kind, just bring us a lot.
In this scenario, you'd probably aim for a common, easy-to-catch fish to maximize your quantity.
As a result, many fish are collected. In contrast, the donation-based incentive is similar to being
told, if you catch an endangered or specific rare fish, your achievement will contribute to
environmental protection. In this case, you might not catch many fish, but you'd likely
ignore common fish and actively seek out rare ones. When you successfully catch a rare fish,
the sense of accomplishment and contributing to society becomes the driving force behind your
action. This study process re-demonstrated this behavioral change, the quantity versus quality,
on a large scale in a real-world citizen science setting, making it the rarest study globally.
And this research finding provides concrete guidelines on how to promote information
gathering activities for biodiversity conservation. For example, when national and
local governments design monitoring activities in collaboration with citizens, they can now
potentially collect data more efficiently by tailoring incentives to their objectives.